We just finished our initial client facing presentation. For someone who dreads presenting, I do pretty well with presentations. I enjoy the adrenaline rush. Frightening.

What I learned from the experience (in particular, the debrief conversation afterward) is that relationships matter. Clearly this is a cliché. But, there’s truth to it. Isn’t half (if not more) of business, the relationship dynamic? As a Resolution Manager, it could be argued my whole job is to maintain, salvage and repair business relationships under adverse circumstances. Preparing an RFP is establishing a different type of relationship. What is this company’s need? How can my team/company meet their need? What do I need to communicate to my client to let them know I am a trusted business partner? There is definitely a need to listen attentively, stay open and read all cues.

Relationships also matter in teaching. For better or worse as teachers in an institution (school, university, workplace) we represent the larger institutions for whom we work. We often walk into a teaching / training environment hoping that students will see us as the type of instructor we want to be. However, students have their own ideas about the institution and the the authority instructors represent. A student’s feelings about an institution and the role of authority can drive a student’s reaction to instruction. Establishing personal relationships is one way to reposition oneself within the traditional teacher-student paradigm. [Though this reminds me of arguments from cultural studies that would claim there is no way, within the system, to disassociate from the authority of the system. All attempts at relationships are mitigating, or attempts at softening what is ultimately an authority structure. --How did I start positive and end in a power paradigm?!] What I mean to highlight by bringing in relationships with respect to teaching, is that one aspect of instruction that students respond to is personal relationships. The personal interest that a teacher / instructor takes in a student can provide motivation for learning. You don’t hear these stories so often in the corporate world, but I know personal relationships were a motivating factor for some of my high school students and adult language learners.

In sum, relationships matter for efficacy in both business and teaching.

ASLlogoI’m engaged in a bidding war with my classmates for a corporate eLearning contract. Managing Information Learning Technology (the class) is a structured role-play centered on a Request for Proposal (RFP). The fictional client, a health care company (HCC), needs help creating an ethics course for their employees. Our team has created our own fictional consulting company (ALS). The initial phase of the RFP consists of reading through the company’s RFP proposal and submitting questions for clarification. HCC’s written solicitation for RFPs was a bit vague. A question session has been established. As a team we have come up with a format to use and questions to submit to HCC. LG had a co-worker who provided the template our group will use, along with the questions we prepared. I found the template very helpful. It provided clearly written document for the company to respond to. Having such a template is one way of showing HCC (or another company) that you, as a bidder, will be clear in your communications, provide structure and accountability. The template was also helpful to me because it was a very concrete document with specifics broken down. For example, it contained the job titles of people who might work on such a project, request for objectives to be clearly stated, etc….

My biggest surprise thus far is learning that it is common practice for a company soliciting RFPs to collect all questions and respond to all questions before the next round in the process. Previously, I assumed a company would use the questions as a measure of the consultants bidding. For example, if the consultants asked no questions, why go further with them. However, I see now that this was a short sighted hypothesis. A company could waste a lot of time responding questions individually. A more efficient use of company time is to get all questions and respond to them all at once, in an addendum format. Ah…. the things we learn! More in the upcoming battle reports!